
Real-time regulatory updates from DEA, DOJ, FDA, CMS, and all 50 state medical boards — curated and analyzed by AI, reviewed by compliance experts. The only source you need to stay ahead of healthcare regulation changes.
210 articles published · Page 1 of 14
Nevada maintains a Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM) doctrine, generally prohibiting corporations from employing physicians or controlling medical practice. However, enforcement in Nevada is often considered more flexible, allowing for management services organization (MSO) models, particularly for telehealth and medspa businesses, provided specific guidelines are followed to preserve physician autonomy.
Telehealth platforms specializing in sexual wellness face a complex patchwork of state-specific regulations, particularly concerning the establishment of a valid patient-provider relationship and the prescribing of controlled substances. Compliance requires meticulous attention to each state's medical practice acts, telemedicine laws, and pharmacy board rules, which often differ significantly.
State chiropractic boards are increasingly defining the scope of telehealth for chiropractors, impacting how remote consultations and patient management can be conducted. Regulations often address patient-practitioner relationships, permissible services, and technology requirements, necessitating careful compliance for practices expanding into virtual care. Understanding these state-specific rules is crucial to avoid regulatory pitfalls and ensure appropriate patient care.
New York maintains one of the nation's strictest Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM) doctrines, prohibiting corporations from employing physicians or practicing medicine. Telehealth companies operating in NY must meticulously structure their operations using Physician-Controlled Management Services Organizations (PC-MSOs) to ensure compliance and avoid severe regulatory penalties.
Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) telehealth weight loss brands face significant compliance challenges in states with strict Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM) doctrines. These regulations prohibit corporations from employing physicians or controlling clinical decisions, necessitating careful structuring to avoid illegal fee-splitting and maintain physician independence.
The Washington State Medical Commission (WMC) and Nursing Care Quality Assurance Commission (NCQAC) establish specific requirements for physician and advanced registered nurse practitioner (ARNP) supervision and delegation, particularly relevant for telehealth and medspa services. These regulations emphasize the importance of ongoing collaboration, defined scope of practice, and appropriate oversight to ensure patient safety and compliance in evolving healthcare delivery models.
Informed consent is a foundational principle in healthcare, and its application to telehealth introduces specific considerations that vary significantly by state. Healthcare providers offering virtual services must understand and adhere to these diverse requirements to ensure legal compliance and ethical patient care.
The District of Columbia Board of Pharmacy sets specific regulations governing telehealth prescribing, compounding, and medication fulfillment, impacting how healthcare providers deliver remote care. These rules emphasize patient-provider relationships, prescription requirements, and pharmacy responsibilities, including for compounded medications.
Telehealth providers must meticulously adhere to complex billing and coding regulations for both commercial insurance and self-pay patients. Compliance requires accurate CPT/HCPCS codes, appropriate modifiers, correct place of service indicators, and transparent pricing for self-pay, all while avoiding fraud, waste, and abuse.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to aggressively pursue enforcement actions against healthcare providers and companies engaged in telehealth fraud, illegal kickbacks, and false claims. These actions highlight the federal government's commitment to safeguarding federal healthcare programs and ensuring legitimate patient care in the rapidly expanding telehealth sector. Practices must ensure strict compliance with anti-kickback statutes, Stark Law, and false claims regulations to avoid severe penalties.
Ohio maintains a strict Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM) doctrine, prohibiting corporations and non-licensed individuals from employing physicians or controlling medical practice. This regulatory framework significantly impacts the operational structures of telehealth companies, medspas, and other healthcare businesses in the state, requiring careful compliance to avoid legal and licensure repercussions.
As teledentistry expands, understanding the specific supervision requirements for dental hygienists and assistants is crucial for compliance. State dental boards are actively defining the scope of practice and permissible levels of supervision for these professionals when utilizing remote technologies, impacting service delivery and patient safety. Practices must ensure their teledentistry models align with these evolving state-specific regulations to avoid compliance risks.
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is intensifying its focus on telehealth providers prescribing controlled substances without proper in-person evaluations, particularly in the context of medications like GLP-1s. This trend signals a renewed emphasis on the Ryan Haight Act and its exceptions, requiring practitioners to ensure legitimate medical purpose and patient safety in virtual care settings.
The Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) Pharmacy Division, which enforces state pharmacy laws, has specific regulations governing medication prescribing, compounding, and fulfillment that directly impact telehealth providers. These rules emphasize patient-provider relationships, prescription requirements, and compounding standards, ensuring patient safety and regulatory compliance within the state's evolving healthcare landscape. Understanding these regulations is crucial for any healthcare business operating via telehealth in Connecticut.
The Michigan Board of Medicine is actively monitoring and enforcing regulations related to telehealth and medspa operations, with disciplinary actions often stemming from issues like unprofessional conduct, scope of practice violations, and inadequate supervision. Healthcare providers and businesses operating in Michigan, particularly those utilizing telehealth or offering medspa services, must ensure strict adherence to state licensing laws, administrative rules, and professional standards to mitigate enforcement risks.
Comprehensive guides, checklists, and templates to help you navigate healthcare compliance — from CPOM structuring to GFE requirements and medical director agreements.
Everything you need to know about GFE requirements, best practices, and state-specific regulations.
Read guideComprehensive breakdown of Corporate Practice of Medicine laws across all 50 states.
Read guideThe definitive checklist for launching and maintaining compliant telehealth and in-person healthcare operations.
Read guideStep-by-step guide to structuring Professional Corporations and Management Services Organizations.
Read guideState-by-state requirements for medical director oversight in telehealth, medspas, IV therapy clinics, and other healthcare operations.
Read guideRegulatory requirements for GLP-1 weight loss medication prescribing via telehealth.
Read guideState-specific CPA templates and guidance for physician-NP collaborative arrangements.
Read guideOur AI-powered intelligence engine monitors DEA, DOJ, FDA, CMS, and all 50 state medical boards so you never miss a compliance update that affects your business.